USPTO serial 79187215
Serial No. 79187215
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79187215?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather E. Balmat
HEATHER E BALMAT BALMAT LAW PLLC977 SEMINOLE TRAIL#342CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22901Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, dolls, gymnastic apparatus and sporting articles, namely nets for sports | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Meat; processed fish, seafood and molluscs; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt and dairy substitutes, namely, butter and cheese substitutes; birds eggs and egg whites; edible oils and fats; processed fruits, edible fungi and vegetables, nuts and pulses; prepared soups; mixes for making soup; canned soups; soup cubes; stock; stock cubes; prepared meals consisting primarily of eggs; prepared dishes consisting principally of meat; prepared meals consisting substantially of seafood; potato-based snack foods; snack foods based on nuts; snack foods based on vegetables; snack foods based on legumes; meat-based snack foods; tofu-based snacks; fruit-based snack food; whipped cream; whipping cream; yoghurt shakes; fruit topping; frozen french fries; dried fruit-based snack food; potato chips; potato flakes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Bakery goods, frozen confectionery, chocolate and bakery desserts; sugars, natural sweeteners, confectioner's coatings in the nature of edible shellac coatings for foods and chocolate-based fillings for bakery goods, bee products, namely, honey; ice, ice creams, frozen yogurts and sorbets; coffee and teas and substitutes therefor; processed grains, food starches, and grain-based snack foods, baking batter mix and yeasts; coffee; tea; cocoa; rice; tapioca; sago; flour; bread; pastry confectionery; candy, namely, sweetmeats; bubble gum; edible ices; sugar; honey; table syrups and treacles; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; spices; ice; rolls made from potato flour; pretzels; rice-based prepared meals; ready-made dishes containing pasta; cheese curls for snacks; dessert pies and meat pies; pizza; pizza crust; popcorn; sandwiches; prepared savory bread made from potato flour; savory pastries; rice-based snack food; prepared foodstuffs in the form of sauces | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beer; non-alcoholic malt beverages; preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beer; preparations for making alcoholic beverages, namely, alcoholic cocktail mixes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2018 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |