USPTO serial 79187264
GARDO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, ANDREA P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GARDO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products used in industry, namely, products for the treatment (including pre- and aftertreatment) of metallic and plastic surfaces, e.g. for the creation of a suitable base for painting and coating (e.g. by derusting and phosphating), for the improvement of corrosion resistance, for facilitating cold forming, for improving sliding properties, for enhancing electrical resistance, as well as products for paint removal or paint detackification, in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | Preservatives against rust and pickling products for metallic surfaces, in this class; industrial oils and lubricants, namely, rolling oils and anti-corrosion oils and lubricants for metals, included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Chemical cleaners for metallic and plastic surfaces, to the extent they are determined for use in connection with the chemical pretreatment not aimed at cleaning, e.g. a pretreatment before painting, as well as degreasers, in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Industrial oils and lubricants, namely, rolling oils as well as oils and lubricants used in the de-formation of metals, in this class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chemetall GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Surventis Surface Treatment GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named GARDO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |