USPTO serial 79187331
NATURES LEAN KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURES LEAN KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal compounds for medical use; herbal preparations for medical use; food supplements; vitamin supplements; food for infants; nutritional supplements containing vitamins, minerals, trace elements, coenzymes, amino acids or nutritional seed oils; probiotic bacterial formulations as nutritional supplements; digestive aids; preparations consisting of mixtures of vitamins and minerals for use as additives for foods for human consumption; health food supplements made principally of vitamins and/or minerals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Prepared meals containing principally eggs; prepared meals containing principally chicken; prepared meals consisting substantially of seafood; prepared meals containing principally bacon; prepared meals consisting principally of game; prepared meals made from meat meat predominating; prepared meals made from poultry poultry predominating; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; prepared meat; prepared vegetables; prepared fruits; prepared vegetable products; prepared meat dishes; prepared salads; soya prepared; mixtures of fruit and nuts; edible nuts; potato-based snack foods; nut-based snack foods; meat-based snack foods; vegetable-based snack foods; fruit-based snack food | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Prepared meals containing principally pasta; prepared meals containing principally rice; prepared pasta meals; dry and liquid ready-to-serve meals, mainly consisting of rice; dry and liquid ready-to-serve meals, mainly consisting of pasta; herbal preparations for making beverages; herbal infusions; prepared rice dishes; prepared pizza meals; prepared pasta dishes; prepared desserts chocolate based, confectionery, pastries; flapjacks; pastries, cakes, tarts and biscuits (cookies); cereal based snack foods; seed based snack bars; granola-based snack bars; rice-based snack food; fruit sauces; savoury sauces, chutneys and pastes; chocolate sauce | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |