Drawing for KIESER BE STRONG STAY STRONG

USPTO serial 79187379

KIESER BE STRONG STAY STRONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIESER BE STRONG STAY STRONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric Fingerhut

ERIC T FINGERHUT DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1301 K STREET NWSUITE 1100 WESTWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed periodicals, books, instructional and teaching material in the field of physical fitness training and exercise, muscle development, bodywork therapy and trainingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
041Physical fitness training services; health and fitness training in the nature of physical fitness training services; provision of fitness centers in the nature of providing gymnasiums; fitness center services in the nature of providing fitness and exercise facilities; personal fitness training servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Provision of professional technical know-how for fitness center services in the nature of planning and design of information technology systems for business franchises in the field of fitness centersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Sports medicine services in the nature of medical services; bodily approach therapy in the nature of bodywork therapySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 23, 2018OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 13, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 21, 2018OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 20, 2018OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2018OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Jun 1, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 16, 2018OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2018GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 20, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2018OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2018OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 31, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 14, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 7, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 7, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 8, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 8, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 14, 2017CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2016CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 16, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 30, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2016RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance