Drawing for BACHI

USPTO serial 79187392

BACHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fish (not live); seaweed extracts for food; clams (not live); processed anchovy; anchovy paste; herrings (not live); tuna fish; bouillon; crayfish (not live); caviar; sea-cucumbers (not live); fish preserves; croquettes; fish fillets; prawns (not live); fat-containing mixtures for bread slices; spiny lobsters (not live); shellfish (not live); mussels (not live); edible mussels (not live); oysters (not live); preserved fish; salted fish; fish-based dishes; sardines; soupsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 9, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 8, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 8, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 14, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 14, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 14, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 11, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 10, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 2, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Jun 2, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance