USPTO serial 79187466
ACTIVE FLOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVE FLOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Projectors; interactive computer game programmes; interactive software programmes; interactive entertainment software; computer hardware; interactive computer systems; interactive graphics screens; computer programmes for interactive television and for interactive games and/or quizzes; games software; software programs for video games; computer graphics software; education software; data communications software; computer software; games software; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; data processing apparatus; computers; cameras; webcams; loudspeakers; keyboards; touch pads electronic; interactive screen placed on the floor to which different games are projected for learning through physical play and movement | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Learning games; educational games; interactive floor pads for controlling video games; apparatus for games | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education; providing of training; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities; development of educational materials | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Maintenance of software; computer software research; design of software; software creation; software design and development; design and development of computer hardware; scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |