USPTO serial 79187574
UPH UNIVERSAL PAYMENT HUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UPH UNIVERSAL PAYMENT HUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON STREETSUITE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Surety services; clearing, financial; credit card services; debit card services, namely, processing of debit card payments; debt advisory services; electronic funds transfer; factoring namely, factoring agencies; trusteeship representation; financial consultancy; financial evaluation services for insurance, banking, real estate; financial information; financial management; financing services; online banking; providing financial information via a web site | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing access to databases; providing user access to global computer networks; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; communications by fiber optic networks; communications by computer terminals; computer aided transmission of messages and images; transmission of digital files; telecommunications routing and junction services; streaming of data; rental of modems; rental of access time to global computer networks; communications by telephone; telephone services; wireless broadcasting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing on-line videos, not downloadable featuring information about electronic money transfers and financial telecommunications; providing on-line electronic publications, not downloadable via a web site in the nature of news articles featuring information about electronic money transfers in the field of financial telecommunication | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer system analysis; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; recovery of computer data; off-site data backup; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; providing search engines for the Internet; engineering; installation of computer software; computer programming; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data not physical conversion; computer technology consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; information technology IT consultancy; computer software consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; monitoring of computer systems by remote access to ensure proper functioning; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; computer virus protection services; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for accommodating multiple types of payment and debt transactions in an integrated mobile phone, PDA, and web based environment, computer software design; rental of web servers; computer rental; rental of computer software; computer system design; technological consultancy in the field of electronic money transfers and financial telecommunications; server hosting | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BulavaMykola Mykolayovych
- Other trademarks owned by Ustymovych Oleg Valentynovych
- Other trademarks owned by Kochkin Ievgen Anatoliyovych
- Other trademarks owned by Burakov Sergii Igorovych
- Other trademarks owned by Ustymovych Oleg Valentynovych
- Other trademarks owned by Burakov Sergii Igorovych
- Other trademarks owned by Kublanovskyi Gennadii Valeriyovych
- Other trademarks owned by Kublanovskyi Gennadii Valeriyovych
- Other trademarks owned by Kochkin Ievgen Anatoliyovych
- Other trademarks owned by BulavaMykola Mykolayovych
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named UPH UNIVERSAL PAYMENT HUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2018 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2017 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |