Drawing for MIRNET TOTAL

USPTO serial 79187657

MIRNET TOTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5211304Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 30, 2017
Examiner
SPARER, KATERINA DOROTHY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIRNET TOTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Cominolli

Elizabeth A. Cominolli BARCLAY DAMON, LLP1270 Avenue of the Americas, Suite 600New York, NY, 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Abrasives, namely, coated abrasives in the form of sheets, strips, rolls and discs, non-woven abrasives in the form of sheets, strips, rolls and discs, flexible abrasives, abrasive net, abrasive cloth, abrasive paper, abrasive discs, abrasive sheets, abrasive strips, abrasive rollsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 28, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 16, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 15, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 30, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 24, 2018CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 15, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 30, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2017COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jul 24, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2017ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 30, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 25, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 22, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 17, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance