USPTO serial 79187717
GIBBSTON VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TORRES, ELIANA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIBBSTON VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Brown
Michael J. Brown Michael J Brown Law Office LLC354 Eisenhower ParkwayPlaza I, 2nd Floor, Suite 2025Livingston, NJ 07039Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, spirits and liqueurs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Marketing services in this class relating to wineries and vineyards; wine sales, cellar door sales, mail order services relating to wine; vineyard management and production of wines; advertising, marketing, and promotion services; business management; business administration; office functions; office support services, business research services, business management assistance, business planning; export agency services; export promotion services; retail and wholesale services in this class, including online and mail order retail and wholesale services; conduct and operation of duty free stores; customer membership programs and customer loyalty schemes; customer discount services, operation of customer privilege programs and providing of information about privilege and offer programs to customers; retail and wholesale services for wine; cellar door sales of wine; mail order services relating to wine; vineyard management for business purposes; advisory, consultancy, and information services in relation to the aforesaid services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |