USPTO serial 79187776
KERRHIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KERRHIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software recorded programs; software for secure remote access to computer networks and communication software, software for management of controlled environments, particularly of clean rooms; user manuals and instructional books featuring information in the fields of computer software and computer software development, in electronic form or on electronic media | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education; training; organization of courses and seminars in the field of computers and software; training for users of installed computer applications; practical training demonstration; organization and conducting of colloquiums, conferences, congresses and training workshops in the field of computers and software; organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes; publication of texts (other than advertising texts) including electronic publication; electronic publication of books and periodicals on-line; providing online electronic publications, not downloadable; production and editing of multimedia products (audiovisual recordings and computer programs) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services as well as research and design relating thereto; programming for computers; consultancy relating to information technology; design, development, configuration, installation, implementation, maintenance, updating, fault diagnosis and upgrading of software; design and development of computer hardware; configuration of computer hardware by means of software; software engineer services for data processing programs and process control; testing services for computer hardware and software used with alarm and surveillance systems; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; planning and configuration of controlled environments, especially of clean rooms; cloud computing services; consultancy services in the field of cloud computing networks and applications; programming of operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; provision of temporary use on-line of software for cloud computing networks, as well as for use thereof | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 26, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |