Drawing for NEOLUX COLLECTION BANDALUX

USPTO serial 79187798

NEOLUX COLLECTION BANDALUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEOLUX COLLECTION BANDALUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dayro Alfonso Estevez

Dayro Alfonso Estevez ALFONSO ESTEVEZ, P.A.Suite 3142300 W 84 StreetHialeah, FL 33016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024CurtainsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 10, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2020CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 26, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 20, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 22, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 3, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance