USPTO serial 79187807
DODIBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DODIBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing access to databases; computer aided transmission of messages and images; transmission of digital files | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Electronic data storage; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring hosting software application provided by third-parties for using in files storage, files sharing and data exchanges for their customers over the internet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TELCO CLOUD TRADING & LOGISTIC LTD
- Other trademarks owned by NAME CUSTODY LUX S.A.R.L
- Other trademarks owned by NAME CUSTODY LUX S.A.R.L
- Other trademarks owned by TELCO CLOUD TRADING & LOGISTIC LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DODIBOX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 13, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 17, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |