Drawing for TEEWAVE

USPTO serial 79187816

TEEWAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5143950Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 21, 2017
Examiner
GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEEWAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPOne Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations for scientific purposes, other than for medical or veterinary use; unprocessed plastics in primary form; adhesives and pastes for use in industry, not for stationery and household purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
017Chemical fiber in the nature of short-cut fiber strands, strings and staples, not for textile use; chemical fiber yarn and thread not for textile use; carbon fiber not for textile use; carbon fiber in the form of sheets, not for textile use; plastic composite materials reinforced with carbon fibers in the form of profiles, boards, sheets, blocks, rods, powder and pellets for use in manufacturing; prepreg materials made in significant part of carbon fibers in the form of profiles, boards, sheets, blocks, rods, powder and pellets for use in manufacturing; plastic film for commercial and industrial use other than for wrapping; plastic substances, semi-processed and plastics, semi processed; raw and semi-worked rubber; electrical insulating materialSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 17, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 14, 2024XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2024XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 8, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 8, 2023C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 21, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 21, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 4, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 23, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance