USPTO serial 79187838
HARCOURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5197751Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2017
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARCOURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Vern
Max Vern Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers; hard ciders; digesters being liqueurs and spirits; wines; spirits; wines of French origin, namely Champagne | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 24, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 9, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |