USPTO serial 79187885
TITOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James N Palik
James N Palik Office of James N Palik5173 S. Vandalia Ave., Unit 8DTulsa, OK 74135Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sunglasses, photographic transparencies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Wrist watches, jewelry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely flyers in the field of apparel, fashion accessories and jewelry, optics, beverages, food service; posters, paper and cardboard transparencies, printed advertising boards, business cards, envelopes, writing paper, notepads and notebooks, labels, exercise books, folders, pamphlets namely pamphlets in the field of apparel, fashion accessories and jewelry, optics, beverages, food service; periodicals namely periodicals in the field of apparel, fashion accessories and jewelry, optics, beverages, food service; magazines namely magazines in the field of apparel, fashion accessories and jewelry, optics, beverages, food service; leaflets namely leaflets in the field of apparel, fashion accessories and jewelry, optics, beverages, food service | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Beers; mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic beverages namely soft drinks, vegetable juices; fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups for making beverages and other preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit and vegetable extracts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink, namely, restaurant and carry-out services; catering services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Titos d.o.o.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named TITOS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |