USPTO serial 79187889
EXRUPTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5107230Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 27, 2016
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXRUPTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kiranjit K Dharsan
Kiranjit K Dharsan Seiter IP1110 N Virgil Ave, Suite #98436Los Angeles, CA 90029United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Software for use in indoor positioning systems *, namely, luggage security detection systems, * and * for * database management in the field of Air travel and shopping malls and commercial shopping areas; ] apparatus for scanning luggage, namely, X-ray based Security Scanners; detectors and sensors, namely, X-ray detectors and sensors not for medical use [ ; tablet computers; global positioning instruments, namely, luminous beacons, wireless computer connection and indoor positioning systems utilizing ultrasound and radio waves ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | [ Luggage trolleys; shopping trolleys ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Exruptive A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Udviklingsselskabet af 2014 A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Udviklingsselskabet af 2014 A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named EXRUPTIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2024 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 11, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |