Drawing for NEO TURF MASTERS

USPTO serial 79187944

NEO TURF MASTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEO TURF MASTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Boris Umansky

BORIS UMANSKY LADAS & PARRY LLP224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; computer game programs recorded on CD-ROMs; computer game programs recorded on data media; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; computer game software for use on mobile computers; computer game software for use on tablet computers; mobile computers; computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; game programs for arcade video game machines; game programs for home video game machines; video game cartridges; video game programs recorded on CD-ROMs; video game programs recorded on data media; electronic circuits and CD-ROMs recorded with programs for hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; downloadable music files; downloadable images and video files featuring video games, scenes of video games and video game characters; downloadable ring tones for mobile phones; compact discs featuring music and video; phonograph records featuring music; downloadable electronic publications, namely, magazines and manuals in the field of game software; cell phone straps; portable telephones; tablet computersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 21, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 4, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2017MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 4, 2017ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 4, 2017OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 4, 2017OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 18, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 16, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 7, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance