USPTO serial 79188085
FREAKSTATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREAKSTATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas N. Masters
Douglas N. Masters Loeb & Loeb LLP321 N. Clark St. Suite 2300Chicago, IL 60654UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milkshakes; flavored milk, namely, chocolate milk, vanilla milk, strawberry milk, caramel milk, hazelnut flavored milk, mint flavored milk, fruit flavored milk, coffee flavored milk, mocha flavored milk, malt flavored milk, almond flavored milk, coconut flavored milk, goats milk, protein flavored milk; milk and milk products, namely, milk powder, milk curd, milk solids, milk cream, milk desserts, milk drinks, milk shakes; preserved, frozen, dried, processed and pre-prepared fruit and vegetables; yoghurt; jellies for food; jams; compotes; eggs; edible oils and fats | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa and artificial coffee; bread; pastry; confectionery, namely, confectionery made of sugar, frozen confectionery, bakery confectionery; boiled sugar confectionery; chocolate confectionery; chocolate flavored confectionery; coated nuts confectionery; dairy confectionery; fruit flavored confectionery; ice confectionery, nut confectionery, pastry confectionery; peanut confectionery; edible ices; sugar, honey, treacle; sauces in the nature of condiments; spices; ice | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages, namely, non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, non-alcoholic beverages flavored with coffee and tea, non-alcoholic beverages flavored with milk, carbonated non-alcoholic beverages; smoothies; fruit and vegetable juice and fruit and vegetable drinks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Provision of food and drink; restaurant services; cafe services; catering services; milk bar services; information, advisory and consultancy services in relation to the aforementioned | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |