Drawing for REISS

USPTO serial 79188251

REISS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REISS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Candles; wicks for lighting; scented candles; fragranced candles; aromatherapy fragrance candles; floating candles; table candles; wax raw material; wicks for candles; tapers; illuminating wax; night lights (candles); candles in tins; candle assemblies; lighting fuel; lamp wicksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2022LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 1, 2022RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2021LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 23, 2021RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
May 14, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2021LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 24, 2020RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 11, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 5, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 18, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 17, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance