USPTO serial 79188323
BABY DAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5168998Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2017
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY DAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith R. Obert
Keith R. Obert Ware, Fressola, Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5Monroe, CT 06468UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Locks of metal, namely, locks of metal, other than electric; gratings of metal; door stops of metal; metal guard barriers for ovens, namely, oven door guards of metal; metal guard barriers for placing in doorways, staircases, corridors and similar places as a barrier to small children and pets; extensions of metal in the nature of extensions for extending the above-mentioned gratings of metal and barriers of metal; metal catches for doors and windows | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metal gratings; portable non-metal free-standing barriers for placing in doorways, staircases, corridors and similar places as a barrier to small children and pets; extensions, not of metal, in the nature of extensions for extending the above-mentioned gratings, not of metal, and barriers, not of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 14, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 13, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |