Drawing for LINAM

USPTO serial 79188331

LINAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC4 TIMES SQ 17TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobile tires; tires for two-wheeled motor vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 27, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 19, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2017MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 18, 2017ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 18, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2017EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 16, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 31, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 31, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 19, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 6, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance