Drawing for RENAISSANCE

USPTO serial 79188333

RENAISSANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RENAISSANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gloria Tsui-Yip

Gloria Tsui-Yip Miskin & Tsui-Yip, LLP1350 Broadway Suite 802New York, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033BrandySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 9, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 22, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 7, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 3, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 22, 2017OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 28, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 5, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 5, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 3, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2016SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance