Drawing for GAMA RECYCLE ELYAF VE IPLIK SANAYI A.S.

USPTO serial 79188501

GAMA RECYCLE ELYAF VE IPLIK SANAYI A.S.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMA RECYCLE ELYAF VE IPLIK SANAYI A.S.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
022Ropes; string; rope ladders; hammocks; fishing nets; tents; awnings; tarpaulins; sails; vehicle covers, not fitted; bags of textile, for packaging; padding and stuffing materials, except of rubber and plastics, including those of wool and cotton; textile fibers; raw spun fiber; glass fibers for textile useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 3, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 6, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 14, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 19, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 19, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 18, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance