Drawing for NITRO CONCEPTS

USPTO serial 79188544

NITRO CONCEPTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5273298Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 29, 2017
Examiner
SPARER, KATERINA DOROTHY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with NITRO CONCEPTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hun Ohm

Hun Ohm Fierst Bloomberg Ohm LLP64 Gothic St, Suite 4Northampton, MA 01060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Office furniture; desks and structural parts therefor; [ computer keyboard trays; ] office chairs and structural parts thereforACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 15, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 12, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 11, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 11, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 29, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 24, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 13, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2017NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 5, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 16, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance