Drawing for QUAD+

USPTO serial 79188580

QUAD+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with QUAD+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald R. Naylor, Jr.

L'Air Liquide Société Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procédés Georges Claude,75 Quai d'OrsayF-75007 PARIS,FRANCE

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Metal storage for compact gas containersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 8, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2017MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 8, 2017ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 14, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 13, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance