Drawing for NEED ESSENTIALS

USPTO serial 79188643

NEED ESSENTIALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEED ESSENTIALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Finkelstein

MITCH MILSTEIN AUCTUS LAW PARTNERS LLP425 30TH STSUITE 14NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing as included in this class, namely, shorts, shirts, skirts, dresses, jumpers, and jackets; belts; frocks; gowns; headbands; pants; singlets; socks; swimsuits; wetsuits; sweaters; coats; gloves; headgear, namely, hats, scarves, sun visors; footwearABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2019FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 20, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 17, 2018MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2018ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2018TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 18, 2018OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 18, 2018OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 18, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2017OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 15, 2017OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2017OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 20, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 10, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance