USPTO serial 79188657
AMEVA EUROPE MEDITERRANEAN TASTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMEVA EUROPE MEDITERRANEAN TASTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Ajvar preserved peppers; artichokes, preserved; bouillon; preparations for making bouillon; bouillon concentrates; toasted laver; peas, preserved; mushrooms, preserved; tomato juice for cooking; tomato paste; seaweed extracts for food; fruit-based snack food; frosted fruits; vegetables, tinned canned (Am.); vegetable mousses; vegetable soup preparations; vegetable salads; vegetable juices for cooking; vegetables, preserved; vegetables, cooked; vegetables, dried; kimchi fermented vegetable dish; sauerkraut; coconut, desiccated; cranberry sauce compote; compotes; fruit peel; gherkins; flaxseed oil for culinary purposes, lentils, preserved; onions, preserved; olives, preserved; rape oil for food; rice milk milk substitute; palm kernel oil for food; palm oil for food; hummus chickpea paste; eggplant paste; vegetable marrow paste; pectin for food; toasted laver; fruit pulp; fruit chips; fruit-based snack food; fruits, tinned canned (Am.); fruit, preserved; fruit preserved in alcohol; fruit jellies; fruit peel; fruit salads; frozen fruits; fruit pulp; edible oils; seeds, prepared; jams; ginger jam; prepared sunflower seeds; sunflower oil for food; soya beans, preserved, for food; soya milk milk substitute; raisins; tahini sesame seed paste; sesame oil; tofu; pollen prepared as foodstuff; truffles, preserved; piccalilli; beans, preserved; dates; peanuts, prepared; peanut butter; peanut milk for culinary purposes; corn oil; preserved garlic; potato chips; apple puree; nuts, prepared | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |