USPTO serial 79188672
SPOTBOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ONUOHA, UKACHUKWU FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPOTBOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software executable on a digital mobile terminal which provides a search engine to locate shops, bars, restaurants, tourist attractions, hotels and other points of interest, and provides information on these points of interest such as practical information, opinions and recommendations of other users or from articles; downloadable computer software executable on a digital mobile terminal that enables the user to create a personal space for recording information concerning shops, restaurants, bars, hotels and other points of interest, the user being able to make all or part of this personal space accessible for other users; downloadable computer software executable on a digital mobile terminal which locates the position of a user for enabling him to interact with other users and places such as shops, bars, restaurants, hotels and other local points of interest; downloadable computer software executable on a digital mobile terminal that aggregates external content published on the Internet and concerning restaurants, bars, hotels, tourist attractions, and other points of interest, and locates the point of interest which is the subject of the publication and redirects the user to the content | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for use in location of shops, restaurants, tourist attractions, bars, hotels and other local points of interest, and for providing information on these points of interest such as practical information, opinions and recommendations as well as articles; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for creating a personal space for recording information concerning shops, restaurants, bars, hotels, and other points of interest, the user being able to make all or part of this personal space accessible for other users; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for locating the position of a user for enabling him to interact with other users and places such as shops, bars, restaurants, hotels and other local points of interest; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring software for aggregating external content published on the Internet concerning local points of interest such as restaurants, bars, hotels, tourist attractions, and software for locating the point of interest which is the subject of the published content and software that redirects the user to the content; providing online websites where users can post ratings, reviews, referrals and recommendations relating to businesses, restaurants and other points of interest | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |