Drawing for NEO TAPIS

USPTO serial 79188725

NEO TAPIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSENBLATT, ANNA
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEO TAPIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D Wells

Nicholas D Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Wall hangings of textile; curtains; table cloths not of paper; draperies, namely, thick drop curtainsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
027Floor coverings; Non-textile wall hangingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 9, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2022FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2022OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2021RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 18, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2017PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Aug 7, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 12, 2017TPDDTEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2017CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
May 26, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 24, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 13, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 13, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance