Drawing for TOPSHIELD²

USPTO serial 79188729

TOPSHIELD²

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSENBLATT, ANNA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOPSHIELD²?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith A. Weltsch

Keith A. Weltsch Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.400 Garden City PlazaSuite 300Garden City, NY 11530

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Paints; varnishes, in particular for protecting floors; lacquers; anti-rust preparations; wood preservatives; dyestuffs; mordants; raw natural resins; metals in foil and powder form for painters, decorators, printers and artistsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 23, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 14, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 16, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 16, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 12, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 12, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 11, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance