Drawing for V-FACTORY

USPTO serial 79188948

V-FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5243349Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2017
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with V-FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tomoko Nakajima

Tomoko Nakajima Cermak Nakajima & McGowan LLP2000 Duke Street Suite 300Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metal working machines; bending machines; metal working machines, namely, press brakes; punch presses for metalworking; forming machines for metal working; slotting machines for metal working; tapping machines; laser processing machines for metal working, industrial robots for metalworking using laser, metal working machines using lasers; shearing machines for metal working; presses for metal working, namely, stamping presses for metalworking; band saw machines for metal working; drilling machines for metal working; grinding machines for metalworking; boring machines for metal working; milling machines; lathe for metal working; welding machines for metal working, namely, electric resistance welding machines for metal working, laser welding machines for metal working, and welding robots for metal working; metal tools for metal working machines; metal blades for metal working machines; industrial robots for use with metal working machines, industrial robots as parts of metal working machines; loading and unloading machines for loading and unloading materials for metal working machines; manipulators for metal working machines; electric arc cutting machines for metal working; electric welding machines for metal working; electric metal cutting machines by plasmaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 2, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 9, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 17, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 3, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 2, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 18, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2021ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jan 28, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 18, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 2, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 29, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 4, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 1, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 20, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 20, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 20, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 19, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance