Drawing for KULA

USPTO serial 79188962

KULA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5283047Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 12, 2017
Examiner
GLASSER, CARYN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with KULA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig Gelfound

Craig Gelfound ArentFox Schiff LLP555 West Fifth Street48th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90013

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic video, audio and image signal processing apparatus, namely, electronic switchers for audio and video signals; electronic apparatus for use in the capture, production, post-production, recording, retrieval, distribution, playout and broadcast of television material, namely, sound, video, image and audio mixers; electronic apparatus and software for switchers and mixers being video, audio and image signal processing apparatus for use in mixing video and audio signals in a live TV production environment to then be broadcast to air; computer operating software, [and tapes and discs featuring computer operating software,] all for use in operating and controlling the functions of electronic video, audio and image signal processing apparatus, namely, switchers and mixers; integrated circuits, circuit boards, and electronic sub- assemblies for use with the foregoing apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 1, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 1, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 15, 2024EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2024PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Apr 9, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2020CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 4, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 26, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 12, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2017RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance