Drawing for PETRO INSPECT

USPTO serial 79189172

PETRO INSPECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PETRO INSPECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Riebling

Peter J. Riebling RIEBLING IP, PLLC1717 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUESUITE 1025WASHINGTON, DC 20006-3951

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Inspection services related to fuel bunker transferring from the supply vessel to the receiving vessel before transportation; inspection of ships that may be concealing fuel before transportationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 22, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 13, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2018OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2017OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 17, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 5, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 22, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 21, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance