USPTO serial 79189194
SP SMART PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SP SMART PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cinematographic apparatus; cameras; cell phones; headphones; microphones; monitors computer hardware; objectives lenses optics; radios; accumulators (electric); chargers for electric batteries; navigational instruments; speed measuring apparatus photography; radar apparatus; flashlamps for cameras; light-emitting electronic pointers; shutter releases; altimeters; distance measuring apparatus; hygrometers; signalling whistles; fog signals, non-explosive; identity cards, magnetic; spectacles optics; contact lenses; spectacle cases; chronographs time recording apparatus; computers; tablet computers; adapted bags, holders, straps and stands for all the aforesaid goods; recorded computer software; adapters for connection between media devices; protective helmets and protective masks for sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 19, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |