USPTO serial 79189196
CDR BEERLAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5158487Status 739Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2017
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with CDR BEERLAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,300
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian A. Tollefson
Brian A. Tollefson Tollefson IP326 First Street, Suite 202Annapolis, MD 21403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Reagents for use in the analysis of foodstuffs, beverages, wines and beers; reagents used for testing water; reagents for use in scientific apparatus for chemical or biological analysis, not for medical or veterinary purposes [ ; reagents for microbiological analysis, not for medical or veterinary purposes; chemical reagents for identification of microorganisms, not for medical or veterinary use ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Apparatus for the analysis of foodstuffs, beverages, wines and beers, namely, spectrophotometric analyzer; diagnostic apparatus for the analysis of foodstuffs, beverages, wines and beers; computer software for collecting, transmission and processing of data for the analysis of foodstuffs, beverages, wines and beers; devices for the control of test and quality of foodstuffs, beverages, wines and beers, namely, micropipettes, test tubes, temperature sensors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 14, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 21, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |