USPTO serial 79189326
Serial No. 79189326
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79189326?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, concrete blocks, concrete blocks for coastal protection, concrete building materials, concrete building elements, concrete retaining walls | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2017 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |