USPTO serial 79189492
RONDEL BLUE TOPAZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5215734Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 6, 2017
- Examiner
- GALAN, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RONDEL BLUE TOPAZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leigh Ann Lindquist
Leigh Ann Lindquist Sughrue Mion, PLLC2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, except beers; wines; sparkling wines; liqueurs; spirits; brandy | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 24, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |