USPTO serial 79189774
VIDEOSECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIDEOSECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking (supervision), life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic recording media, optical or sound recording disks; compact disks, DVDs and other digital recording media; equipment for data processing and computers; software (recorded programs); computer peripherals; electric batteries; detectors; electric wires; electric relays; clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; protection devices for personal use against accidents; diagnostic apparatus not for medical use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; communications by computer terminals or by fiber-optic networks; communications by radio or telephone; provision of on-line forums; electronic bulletin board services (telecommunication services); connection by telecommunications to a global computer network; rental of telecommunication apparatus; teleconferencing or videoconferencing services; rental of access time to global computer networks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Evaluations and assessments in the fields of science and technology provided by engineers; scientific and technical research; design and development of computers and software; research and development of new products for others; technical project study; development (design), installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software; computer programming; computer system analysis; design of computer systems; consultancy in the design and development of computers; software as a service (SaaS); information technology (IT) consultancy; hosting of servers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |