USPTO serial 79189937
TRIBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRIBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cell phone battery chargers for use in vehicles; Battery chargers; Battery chargers for use with telephones; Personal headphones for sound transmitting apparatuses; Electric connection cables; USB flash drives not pre-recorded; blank USB flash drives; Headsets for mobile telephones; all of the aforesaid goods being other than three-pole vertical fuse holders | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2019 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 21, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |