Drawing for LOVEBOX

USPTO serial 79190026

LOVEBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5262934Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2017
Examiner
TENG, SIMON
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LOVEBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $1,950

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JANET G RICCIUTI

JANET G RICCIUTI JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI PC2003 KALORAMA ROAD NWWASHINGTON, DC 20009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus excluding modems for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images intended solely for the transmission of [ highly ] * high * emotional * value * content * and not including those relating to music events and festivals * ; apparatus excluding modems and data processing equipment intended solely for the transmission of [ highly ] * high * emotional * value * content * and not including those relating to music events and festivals * ; computer operating programs, recorded intended solely for the transmission of [ highly ] * high * emotional * value * content * and not including those relating to music events and festivals *ACTIVE—
038[ Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages among computer users relating to goods intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional content; electronic bulletin board services intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional content; rental of telecommunication apparatus excluding modems intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional content; ] Electronic messaging services intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional contentACTIVE—
042Design and development of computers and software intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional content; design of interior decor relating to goods intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional content; Design, installation, maintenance, updating or rental of software intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional content [ ; digitization of documents intended solely for the transmission of highly emotional content ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2025INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 22, 2025INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2025XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2025XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 9, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 8, 2025INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 8, 2024NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 8, 202471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 25, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 12, 2023ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2018INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 28, 2018COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Feb 26, 2018LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 19, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 6, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 15, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 30, 2017ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 30, 2017LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2017CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 21, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 26, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 25, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance