USPTO serial 79190040
CHROMX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5273311Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHROMX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Global Life Sciences Solutions Germany GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Global Life Sciences Solutions Germany GmbH
76131 Karlsruhe, DE
76131 Karlsruhe, DE
DE
76149 Karlsruhe, DE
76135 Karlsruhe, DE
76327 Pfinztal, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dyan M. House
Dyan M. House Baker & Mckenzie, LLP1900 N. Pearl Street, Suite 1500Dallas, TX 75201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Simulation-equipment, -apparatus, -instruments and -devices, all of the aforesaid goods for chromatography-simulation in the field of biochemistry for laboratory and scientific purposes excluding all goods in and for the field of in-vitro-diagnostics; simulation software, in particular chromatography simulation software for use in digital computers; all of the aforesaid good in the field of biochemistry excluding all goods in and for the field of in-vitro-diagnostics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Advisory services relating to biochemistry; biochemical research and development; providing of information on the subject of scientific research and development in the field of biochemistry and biotechnology; all aforementioned services excluding services in and for the field of in-vitro-diagnostics | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Global Life Sciences Solutions Germany GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GoSilico GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GoSilico GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by GoSilico GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Huuk, Thiemo
- Other trademarks owned by Hahn, Tobias
- Other trademarks owned by Hubbuch, Jürgen
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CHROMX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 16, 2024 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2017 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2017 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |