USPTO serial 79190078
LAS BAYADAS HECHO EN MEXICO - MADE IN MEXICO B
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNN LEWIS, LAKEISHA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAS BAYADAS HECHO EN MEXICO - MADE IN MEXICO B?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Table runners, quilts, bed covers, bedspreads, throws, curtains of textile or plastic, shower curtains of textile or plastic, labels of cloth, dust sheets for furniture, pillowcases, decorative pillow covers, covers for cushions, bed linen sets, traveling rugs, bed blankets, bed coverlets, tablecloths not of paper, table mats not of paper, place-mats not of paper, textile furniture coverings, bath linen excluding clothing, bed linen, table linen not of paper, household linen, sheets, sleeping bag sheets, table napkins of textile materials, fabric, cotton fabrics, elastic woven material, jute fabrics, woolen fabrics, linen cloth, ramie fabrics, rayon fabrics, silk fabrics, esparto fabric, knitted fabric, fabrics for textile use, fabric with printed motifs for embroidery | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 11, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |