Drawing for IMMERSED COMPUTING

USPTO serial 79190144

IMMERSED COMPUTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5303735Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2017
Examiner
ADEMI, XHENETA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with IMMERSED COMPUTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allison R. Imber

Allison R. Imber Allen, Dyer, Doppelt & Gilchrist, PA255 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 1401Orlando, FL 32801United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting services in the field of cloud computing related to cooling of computer equipment and datacentersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 25, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2024ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 16, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 10, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 10, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 5, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 30, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2017NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
May 30, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2017PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 30, 2017PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 1, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance