Drawing for DIMPLUSH

USPTO serial 79190239

DIMPLUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5225313Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 2017
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIMPLUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobiles and their structural parts and fittings, namely, rear suspensions, front forks, air suspensions, suspensions and shock absorbers; two-wheeled motor vehicles and their structural parts and fittings, namely, rear suspensions, front forks, air suspensions, suspensions and shock absorbers; bicycles and their structural parts and fittings, namely, rear suspensions, front forks, air suspensions, suspensions and shock absorbers; front forks for motorcycles; front forks for bicycles; shock absorbers for automobiles; shock absorbers for land vehicles; hydraulic shock absorbers for bicycles; suspension systems for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2024INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 7, 2024INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2024INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 29, 2024INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 30, 2024NC71NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 71 E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2024C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 22, 2023PUM1OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1—
Jun 21, 2023APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 20, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2017FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2017FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2017FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 20, 2017FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2016RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 2, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 1, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance