USPTO serial 79190279
MATCHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEELEY, ALISON REBECCA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MATCHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Rental of shared vehicles by electronic means via a reservation platform, by means of an on-board device; provision and delivery of vehicles to others with a view to their shared rental; provision of information regarding car sharing; parking services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 23, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |