Drawing for GENESIS

USPTO serial 79190282

GENESIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5361873Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 26, 2017
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with GENESIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B St. Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Wholesale and retail store services featuring automobiles; wholesale and retail store services for parts and accessories for automobiles; wholesale and retail store services for used cars; automobile dealerships; dealerships in the field of automobile parts and automobile accessories; commercial information agency services; business management of sports people; arranging of commercial car exhibitions for promotional purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 17, 2024NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2024C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 16, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 21, 2023ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2022REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2018FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 2, 2018FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 26, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 26, 2017R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2017GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 10, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2017OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2017OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2017EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 28, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 17, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 17, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2017RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 17, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 17, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2016RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2016RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 7, 2016RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 6, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2016MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2016REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance