USPTO serial 79190293
FASCLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FASCLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Abigail Zeller
ABIGAIL ZELLER GROSSMAN TUCKER PERREAULT & PFLEGER55 SOUTH COMMERCIAL STREETMANCHESTER, NH 03101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Laundry preparations, namely, laundry detergents; soap; cakes of soap; hair lotions; laundry powder, namely, washing powder; detergent, namely, dishwashing detergents; cleaning preparations; cosmetics; dentifrices; cosmetics for animals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2017 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2016 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2016 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |