USPTO serial 79190514
BLEICHERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2018
- Examiner
- LEE,YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BLEICHERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $2,600
Owner
BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
DE
Other trademarks owned by BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
Osterburken, DE
Other trademarks owned by BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Bagarazzi
James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automatic conveyor installations, namely, conveyor lines and assembly line conveyor machinery; machinery for conveying, linking and/or assembling; loading, unloading, holding, and/or transferring machines; conveyors, in particular belt conveyors and roller conveyors | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Driverless transporter vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, repair and/or servicing of machines; installation, repair and/or servicing of conveyor systems, conveyor belts, conveying apparatus, conveyor machines, lifts, storage facilities, industrial plants, technical installations and driverless transporter vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | engineering consultation; engineering services; technological consultancy in the field of conveying and industrial robot systems; control technology consulting services in the field of conveying industrial robot systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by BLEICHERT Automation GmbH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLEICHERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 3, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2024 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2018 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |