USPTO serial 79190534
PASH BAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBIN, DAVID I
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PASH BAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather; leather, unworked or semi-worked; bags, namely, handbags, barrel bags, Boston bags, shoulder bags, mesh shopping bags, leather shopping bags, cabin bags, sacks in the nature of a soft handbag, clutch bags, backpacks; clutch purses; coin purses; wallets; leather credit card holder; keycases; rucksacks; all purpose sports bags; haversacks; beach bags; carrying cases for documents; shopping bags with wheels attached; textile shopping bags; school satchels; suitcases; sports bags; duffel bags; bumbags; empty cosmetic bags; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas and parasols; walking sticks; leads for animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 28, 2020 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |