USPTO serial 79190606
SKOOLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKOOLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing a general and standard tool for educational institutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and design relating thereto, namely, a technological platform for use by the educational institution, services contemplated, a computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 26, 2018 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2016 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 3, 2016 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |